Understand Personality Structure Clinical -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Understand Personality Structure Clinical? Answer: Introducation Personality is defined as the combination of traits or characteristics that create a persons distinct character; it is the visible aspect of an individuals character which impresses others. In other words, personality is referred as a set of emotional qualities or method of behaving in certain situations that differentiate a person from others (Kim, Hon Lee, 2010). This essay will focus on different theoretical arguments provided by experts on peoples personalities. Many experts have given several personalities theories within psychology in order to explain different ideas about how a persons personality develops and what factors contribute to personalitys development. In recent years, management focus on analysing and learning about their employees personalities since it assists in establishing a positive working environment. Managers implement organisational behaviour theories in the corporation which assist them in motivating employees by evaluating their personalities that assis t in increasing their productive performance. This essay will compare and contrast various theoretical arguments given by an expert on peoples personalities in an organisation. Further, the essay will evaluate how managers can use this information to establish a positive working environment in the enterprise and increase employees productive performance. There are several personality types in an organisation which influence the behaviour of employees; managers focus on influencing workers behaviour by assessing their personality traits and use them to their advantage. One of the most popular theories of personality is provided by Sigmund Freud called Psychodynamic theory. This theory provides that personality is the basic structure of id, ego, and superego. As per Freud, these factors unconsciously impact personality traits, and they are developed at the early childhood stage (McWilliams, 2011). The id or Instinctive drives part of the brain is completely unconscious, whereas, ego and superego are both conscious and unconscious parts. The id includes factors such as food, sex, aggression and others, and they are influenced by early childhood influences, especially by parents. First five years of children early childhood has a significant influence on their personality, and it is largely affected by their parents behaviour. Similarly, Freud provided that manager is subordinates parent figure, and they can be good or bad depending on how manager perceived the situation. The employees who idealise their manager are more likely to be sensitive to criticism, therefore, they should be treated differently during a performance review that other subordinates who did not have any issue with constructive criticism (McLeod, 2017). Unlike Freuds psychodynamic theory, the Biological theory of personality provides that genetics are responsible for personality traits of people. The biological theory of personality contradicts Freuds theory which provides that nurturing influence a persons personality such as parenting or early childhood experiences, whereas, the biological theory provides that natural factors such as genetics influence a person personality traits. The study conducted on heritability suggested that there is a link between personality traits and genetics (Cuncic, 2017). Hans Eysenck provided that personality has a direct link with biological processes. For example, employees with introvert personality had high cortical arousal which assists in leading them to avoid stimulation. However, extrovert employees, on the other hand, had low cortical arousal that causes them to seek out stimulating experiences (Lewin, 2013). Although, many experts have provided that biological theory did not have any influe nce on Big five personality traits which include operations, extraversion, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and agreeableness. But, recent studies have suggested that biological factors might influence this model as well (Selfhout, Burk, Branje, Denissen, Van Aken Meeus, 2010). Therefore, this theory provides that managers have to assess their employees personality and assign them jobs accordingly because their personality traits are natural and it is difficult to influence them by external factors. The Freuds psychodynamic theory is a part of behavioural theories of personality, whereas, the biological theory is opposite of behavioural theories. Similarly, there are various traits theories provided by experts which are based on personality qualities analysis. These theories are used by managers to study employees personality in a corporation which assists in implementing appropriate organisational behaviour theories. Traits are defined as habitual part of a persons emotions, thoughts, and behaviour (Ryckman, 2012). These theories provide that personality factors remain stable over time,f and they are different for each individual, for example, some employees are extroverts who are good at handling supervision tasks whereas introvert employees prefer desk jobs. Each person has a unique set of skills which differentiate it from others, and managers measure these personality characteristics to implement appropriate organisational behaviour theories. Hans Eysenck is one of the most famous British psychologists; he provided that there are two key dimensions of a personality, which includes extroversion and introversion that account for all the other personalities. Extroversion personality people are loud and outgoing whereas introversion personality people are quiet and reserved (Eysenck, 2012). This theory is similar to the biological theory of personality since it provided that people primarily divided into two categories: extroverts and introverts. Just as the biological theory of personality, this theory provides that extrovert employees have low arousal level whereas introvert workers have high arousal level. Gordon Allport was among the first ever psychologist who provided personality based trait. His theory is different from Eysenck theory who divided personality into two key dimensions, whereas, Allport theory provide that there are more than four thousand words in English dictionary which define personality traits. He divided traits into three key parts: cardinal, central and secondary (Chen, Yang, Chen, Tseng Lee, 2013). Cardinal traits are developed later in life, and they influence a persons decision key life decision such as kindness, greed, narcissism or lust. Central traits are major characteristics of a persons that leads to creating their personality such as anxious, intelligent, or shy. Secondary traits are the general behaviour of a person that only appears in specific situations such as getting nervous while p ublically speaking (Ickes Knowles, 2012). The traits theories assist managers in implementing appropriate organisational behaviour theory, for example, the manager can implement Personality-Job Fit theory during the recruitment process which assists them in analysing a job candidates traits and assign him post accordingly. Social Learning Theory of personality given by Alan Bandura is another popular theory of personality which is used by managers in order to influence their employees personalities to increase their performance. Bandura agrees with the classical conditioning and operant conditioning behaviourist theories, but he further provided new principles which include mediating process and observational learning. The theory provides that employees imitate the behaviour qualities of people around them, and they respond to punishment and reinforcement (McLeod, 2016). Unlike Freuds psychodynamic theory and Biological theory of personality, Social learning theory provides that the actions of managers can change the personality of an employee. Managers can implement policies of reinforcement, punishment or motivation which assist in changing employees personalities and increase their productive performance (McCleskey, 2014). Freuds psychodynamic theory and Biological theory of personality provide that managers cannot change personality, instead, workers should be assign jobs based on their personality and policies should be made accordingly to achieve maximum productivity. Whereas, Social learning theory provides that personality of an employee is influenced by several external factors and managers can implement policies to influence their productive performance positively. In recent years, the role of personality theories has grown substantially in corporations because each company focuses on gaining a competitive advantage over its customers. Employees are considered as crucial assets for modern corporations and managers focus on increasing their productive performance by providing them appropriate incentives (Li, Liang Crant, 2010). Managers use personality theories to understand their employees attitude and use such information to implement various organisational behaviour theories. For example, Freuds Psychodynamic theory can assist managers in implementing the appropriate motivational theory in the organisation because it assists them in analysing which employee will prefer monetary or non-monetary rewards (Korsgaard, Meglino, Lester Jeong, 2010). The Social Learning theory provides them managers should implement a positive and challenging organisational environment which will influence employees to increase their productive performance. In conclusion, modern corporations use personality theories which assist managers in implementing effective organisational behaviour theories which provide them a competitive advantage. Various experts have given different personality theories based on different key aspects such as biological, behavioural, or traits. Managers use various personality theories while performing business activities such as Freuds Psychodynamic theory, Eysenck Personality Traits theory, Social Learning theory, Allport Personality Traits theory, the Biological theory of personality, and many others. These theories provide necessary employees behaviour information to managers that assist them in implementing different organisational behaviour theories for different business functions such as motivating employees, establishing a positive working environment or many others. Modern corporations should effectively implement organisational theories based on employees personalities since it provides them a compet itive advantage and sustains their future growth. References Chen, C. W., Yang, H. C., Chen, C. H., Tseng, C. P., Lee, K. L. (2013). Retracted: The Relationship between Personality Traits and Sales Force Automation Usage: A Review of Methodology.Human Factors and economics in Manufacturing Service Industries,23(4), 294-305. Cuncic, A. (2017). What Are the Genetic Causes of Social Anxiety Disorder?. Retrieved from https://www.verywell.com/what-are-the-genetic-causes-of-social-anxiety-disorder-3024457 Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.). (2012).A model for personality. Berlin: Springer Science Business Media. Ickes, W., Knowles, E. S. (Eds.). (2012).Personality, roles, and social behavior. Berlin: Springer Science Business Media. Kim, T. Y., Hon, A. H., Lee, D. R. (2010). Proactive personality and employee creativity: The effects of job creativity requirement and supervisor support for creativity.Creativity Research Journal,22(1), 37-45. Korsgaard, M. A., Meglino, B. M., Lester, S. W., Jeong, S. S. (2010). Paying you back or paying me forward: understanding rewarded and unrewarded organizational citizenship behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology,95(2), 277. Lewin, K. (2013).A dynamic theory of personality-selected papers. Worcestershire: Read Books Ltd. Li, N., Liang, J., Crant, J. M. (2010). The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: a relational perspective.Journal of applied psychology,95(2), 395. McCleskey, J. A. (2014). Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development.Journal of Business Studies Quarterly,5(4), 117. McLeod, S. (2016). Bandura - Social Learning Theory. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/bandura.html McLeod, S. (2017). Theory of Personality. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/personality-theories.html McWilliams, N. (2011). psychology diagnosis: Understanding personality structure in the clinical process. New York City: Guilford Press. Ryckman, R. M. (2012).Theories of personality. Boston: Cengage Learning. Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., Van Aken, M., Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach.Journal of personality,78(2), 509-538.